Explain the constitutional perspectives of Gender Justice with the help of relevant Constitutional Provisions and case laws.

Cite the Rakhi Bisht judgment as recent case law reading Articles 14, 15, 21 and 42 with a welfare statute to protect women's careers, not only pay.

• On 31 August 2026 the Delhi High Court (Justice Sachin Datta) held a woman returning from maternity leave is entitled to her previous post or an equivalent one in role, authority and prospects.
• Retaining designation and pay is 'necessary but not by itself sufficient'; the Court relied on Section 12(1) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 and Articles 14, 15, 21 and 42.
• It awarded ₹10 lakh compensation and ₹1.5 lakh costs, and directed the Union to frame rules within six months on role protection, lactation support, crèches and anti-retaliation safeguards.

Use it as a 2026 example of the Supreme Court grounding women's safety in Article 21's guarantee of dignified life and demanding institutional accountability.

• In In Re: Recent Rape Incidents in Delhi NCR (28 September 2026), Justices Pardiwala and Vinod Chandran relied on Article 21, which includes living with dignity, and said "Expressing solidarity is not a solution".
• Legal arc: the Justice J.S. Verma Committee led to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, which widened the definition of rape and added stalking and voyeurism; the POCSO Act, 2012 protects children.
• The Court reminded media that Section 72 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 23 of the POCSO Act bar disclosing a victim's identity.