Pratidin

UPSC current affairs quiz, 5 November 2026

30 Prelims-style questions on the day's news, in the formats UPSC uses (statement-based, How many, Statement-I and II), each with the answer and an explanation. Try each one before you open the answer.

Read 5 November 2026 first4 November 2026 quiz6 November 2026 quizTimed test in the app

SC: two-child bars on poll candidates have lost relevance; Javed goes to larger Bench

  1. Consider the following statements:
    1. Article 243F of the Constitution allows a State Legislature to lay down, by law, grounds of disqualification for members of a Panchayat.
    2. In Javed v. State of Haryana (2003), the Supreme Court struck down a two-child disqualification for panchayat posts.
    3. A Bench of two judges of the Supreme Court cannot overrule a judgment delivered by a Bench of three judges.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 1 and 3 only
    3. 2 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is correct: Article 243F(1)(b) disqualifies a person disqualified by or under any law made by the State Legislature. Statement 2 is wrong: Javed upheld the Haryana bar. Statement 3 is correct: a smaller Bench must refer a doubt about a larger Bench's ruling, which is why the November 2026 Bench sent Javed to a larger Bench.

  2. Consider the following statements about the Supreme Court's ruling of 4 November 2026:
    1. It was delivered by a Constitution Bench of five judges.
    2. It struck down Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
    3. It linked reproductive decisions to personal liberty under Article 21.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) Only one. Only statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is wrong: the Bench had two judges. Statement 2 is wrong: the Court did not strike down the law; it referred Javed to a larger Bench and stayed the proceedings against the sarpanch.

  3. Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: The Supreme Court Bench that heard Mangala Ingle's appeal referred Javed v. State of Haryana to a larger Bench instead of overruling it.
    Statement-II: Javed v. State of Haryana was decided by a Bench of three judges, and a smaller Bench cannot overrule a larger Bench's decision.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    1. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
    2. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
    3. Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
    4. Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I. Both are correct, and the rule of precedent in Statement-II is the reason the two-judge Bench sent Javed to a larger Bench.

  4. With reference to the total fertility rate (TFR), consider the following statements:
    1. TFR is the average number of children a woman would bear over her reproductive life at current age-specific fertility rates.
    2. A TFR of about 2.1 is called the replacement level.
    3. The Supreme Court in 2026 cited India's TFR as 1.9.
    4. India's TFR was about 3 in 2003.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: (d) All four. All four are correct. Statements 1 and 2 are the standard definitions; statements 3 and 4 are the figures the Court cited (about 3 in 2003, 1.9 now).

  5. Which one of the following States was NOT listed among those that still retain a two-child bar for local body elections, as per the amicus curiae's compilation?

    1. Odisha
    2. Uttarakhand
    3. Haryana
    4. Assam
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) Haryana. The six States listed were Assam, Goa, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Odisha and Uttarakhand. Haryana's 1994 law was the one upheld in Javed, but it is not on the list of six.

  6. Consider the following statements:
    1. Part IX of the Constitution, on panchayats, was added by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment.
    2. Under Article 243F, a person can be disqualified from panchayat membership by or under a law made by the State Legislature.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2. Both are correct. The 73rd Amendment (1992) inserted Part IX, and Article 243F(1)(b) is the route Haryana and Maharashtra used for two-child bars.

SC closes 27-year-old reference, says Kodar governs States' surcharges on sales tax

  1. After the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, Entry 54 of the State List covers taxes on the sale of which of the following?
    1. Petroleum crude
    2. Natural gas
    3. Alcoholic liquor for human consumption
    4. Pharmaceutical products
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 1, 2 and 3 only
    3. 2, 3 and 4 only
    4. 1, 2, 3 and 4
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) 1, 2 and 3 only. The substituted Entry 54 covers sale of petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit, natural gas, aviation turbine fuel and alcoholic liquor for human consumption (not inter-State or international sales). Pharmaceuticals are under GST, which Article 246A governs.

  2. Consider the following statements about Arjun Flour Mills v. State of Odisha (2026):
    1. It was decided by a seven-judge Bench.
    2. The Court struck down Section 5-A of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947.
    3. The Court said S. Kodar governs the question of State legislative competence.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) Only two. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is wrong: the Court did not strike down the provision; it held the reference infructuous and left individual cases to regular Benches under Kodar.

  3. Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: The Supreme Court held in 2026 that the conflict between Kodar and India Cement no longer survived.
    Statement-II: In 2024, a nine-judge Bench held that royalty on minerals is not a tax.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    1. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
    2. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
    3. Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
    4. Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I. Both are correct. India Cement's conflict with Kodar rested on treating royalty as a tax; once MADA (2024) removed that premise, the conflict fell away.

  4. With reference to the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016, consider the following statements:
    1. It inserted Article 246A.
    2. It substituted Entry 54 of the State List.
    3. It created the GST Council under Article 279A.
    4. It placed a general power to tax income in the State List.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) Only three. Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 4 is wrong: income tax (other than agricultural income) remains with the Union under Entry 82 of List I.

  5. In tax law, the 'nature versus measure' distinction means that:

    1. The rate of a tax decides which legislature may levy it
    2. The thing on which a tax truly falls decides the list, even if its amount is calculated using another base
    3. A tax measured on another tax is always invalid
    4. States may levy any tax so long as it is earmarked for a fund
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) The thing on which a tax truly falls decides the list, even if its amount is calculated using another base. Courts look at the nature (pith and substance) of a levy to locate it in the lists; the measure used to compute it does not change its character. That is why Kodar treated a surcharge on sales tax as sales tax.

  6. Consider the following statements:
    1. Article 266 provides that revenues received by a State form part of the Consolidated Fund of the State.
    2. In Arjun Flour Mills, the Supreme Court finally decided whether Punjab's social security cess could bypass the Consolidated Fund.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) 1 only. Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is wrong: the seven-judge Bench left the Article 266 question open for a regular Bench.

Cabinet extends fast-track courts for rape and POCSO cases to 2031 with ₹3,788 crore

  1. With reference to the Fast Track Special Courts (FTSC) scheme, consider the following statements:
    1. It is a Central Sector Scheme fully funded by the Union government.
    2. The Central share is funded from the Nirbhaya Fund.
    3. It covers trials of rape cases and of offences under the POCSO Act, 2012.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) 2 and 3 only. Statement 1 is wrong: it is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme, with States and UTs bearing ₹1,434.89 crore of the ₹3,788.04 crore outlay. Statements 2 and 3 are correct as per the Cabinet decision of 4 November 2026.

  2. Consider the following statements about the FTSC scheme as extended in November 2026:
    1. It will run till 31 March 2031.
    2. The number of courts is planned to rise to 850.
    3. Each court has two judicial officers.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) Only two. Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong: each FTSC has one judicial officer, one special public prosecutor and six support staff.

  3. Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: The FTSC scheme requires States and Union Territories to bear part of its cost.
    Statement-II: The FTSC scheme is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    1. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
    2. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
    3. Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
    4. Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I. Both are correct, and cost-sharing is what defines a Centrally Sponsored Scheme: States and UTs bear ₹1,434.89 crore of the outlay.

  4. With reference to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, consider the following statements:
    1. It protects persons below 18 years of age.
    2. It provides for Special Courts to try offences under the Act.
    3. It expects a Special Court to complete the trial within one year of taking cognizance, as far as possible.
    4. It applies only to girls.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) Only three. Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 4 is wrong: POCSO is gender-neutral and covers any child below 18.

  5. The Supreme Court direction of 25 July 2019 that led to exclusive POCSO courts asked for such a court in every district with:

    1. More than 50 pending POCSO cases
    2. More than 100 pending POCSO cases
    3. More than 500 pending POCSO cases
    4. Any pending POCSO case older than one year
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) More than 100 pending POCSO cases. The direction, in a suo motu case on rising child rape incidents, set the threshold at more than 100 pending POCSO cases per district.

  6. Consider the following statements:
    1. The FTSC scheme has disposed of more than four lakh cases since its launch.
    2. FTSCs currently function in all 36 States and Union Territories.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) 1 only. Statement 1 is correct: 4,02,457 cases. Statement 2 is wrong: the 779 functional courts are spread across 29 States and UTs.

Op-ed: Double-fortified salt is no quick fix for India's many-sided anaemia problem

  1. Consider the following statements:
    1. Double-fortified salt is fortified with iodine and iron.
    2. Iron from plant foods (non-haem iron) is absorbed better when eaten with tea.
    3. Hepcidin, a hormone, reduces iron absorption during infection and inflammation.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is wrong: polyphenols in tea inhibit non-haem iron absorption; vitamin C enhances it. Statement 3 is correct: hepcidin blocks iron uptake during infection, one reason fortification works least where infection is common.

  2. Consider the following statements about anaemia in NFHS-5 (2019-21):
    1. 67.1% of children aged 6 to 59 months were anaemic.
    2. Anaemia among women aged 15 to 49 fell compared with NFHS-4.
    3. Anaemia among men aged 15 to 49 was 25%.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) Only two. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is wrong: anaemia among women aged 15 to 49 rose from 53.1% in NFHS-4 to 57% in NFHS-5.

  3. Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: Universal iron fortification of salt can pose risks for people with thalassaemia.
    Statement-II: People with thalassaemia are prone to iron overload, and the body cannot easily excrete excess iron.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    1. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
    2. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
    3. Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
    4. Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I. Both are correct, and the tendency to iron overload, with no easy route to excrete iron, is why universal iron fortification is risky for them.

  4. Which of the following reduce the absorption of non-haem iron from a meal?
    1. Phytates in cereals
    2. Polyphenols in tea
    3. Vitamin C
    4. Calcium
    How many of the above reduce absorption?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) Only three. Phytates, polyphenols and calcium inhibit non-haem iron absorption. Vitamin C enhances it, so three of the four reduce absorption.

  5. The op-ed argues that double-fortified salt may poorly reach those who most need iron because:

    1. Salt is not sold in rural areas
    2. Young children and women eat the least salt, while adult men eat the most
    3. Iron makes salt taste bitter, so it is rejected
    4. DFS is banned in the Public Distribution System
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) Young children and women eat the least salt, while adult men eat the most. The op-ed notes salt intake is lowest among young children and women, the groups with the highest anaemia, so a salt vehicle under-doses them.

  6. Consider the following statements:
    1. Anaemia Mukt Bharat was launched in 2018.
    2. Its original framework was the 6x6x6 strategy.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2. Both are correct: Anaemia Mukt Bharat began in 2018 with six target groups, six interventions and six institutional mechanisms.

Op-ed: BRICS carbon partnership should build a common rulebook before a common market

  1. Consider the following statements:
    1. Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement provides for cooperative approaches in which countries transfer mitigation outcomes between them.
    2. A corresponding adjustment ensures that a transferred emission reduction is not counted by both the selling and the buying country.
    3. The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism entered its definitive phase on 1 January 2026.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: (d) 1, 2 and 3. All three are correct. Article 6.2 covers bilateral transfers of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes; corresponding adjustments prevent double counting; and the EU CBAM moved from its transitional to definitive phase on 1 January 2026.

  2. Consider the following statements about the op-ed's proposals for the BRICS Carbon Markets Partnership:
    1. It recommends an immediate common BRICS trading platform.
    2. It recommends common measurement, reporting and verification rules for CBAM-exposed sectors.
    3. It suggests a small pilot under Article 6.2 among two or three members.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) Only two. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 1 is wrong: the op-ed argues for a common rulebook, not a common trading platform, and treats full linkage as neither likely nor desirable.

  3. Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: Exporters to the EU benefit from having verifiable data on the emissions embedded in their products.
    Statement-II: Under CBAM, importers who cannot show actual embedded emissions may be charged on default values.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    1. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
    2. Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
    3. Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
    4. Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I. Both are correct, and the default-value rule explains why verified emissions data matter to exporters, the core reason the op-ed wants common MRV rules.

  4. With reference to India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), consider the following statements:
    1. It was notified under the Energy Conservation Act, 2001.
    2. Its compliance mechanism sets absolute caps on total national emissions.
    3. The United Kingdom lists it among qualifying overseas carbon pricing schemes.
    4. It is linked to China's national emissions trading system.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: (b) Only two. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is wrong: India uses emission-intensity targets, not an absolute cap. Statement 4 is wrong: no BRICS carbon market is linked to another.

  5. Which one of the following is NOT among the goods covered by the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism?

    1. Iron and steel
    2. Aluminium
    3. Fertilisers
    4. Textiles
    Show answer

    Answer: (d) Textiles. CBAM covers iron and steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, electricity and hydrogen. Textiles are not covered.

  6. Consider the following statements:
    1. The New Delhi Declaration of 2026 opposed unilateral, punitive, discriminatory and protectionist measures.
    2. The BRICS Carbon Markets Partnership already has binding emission targets for members.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) 1 only. Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is wrong: the op-ed notes the partnership has no trading framework, targets or timeline; it focuses on capacity building and exchange of experience.