Can the constitutional mandate of rights-based welfare be effectively realised in the context of non-integrated governance and minimal public investment? Examine.
Question source: insightsonindia.com
Write a timed answer in the appCurrent affairs to use in your answer
EPFO wage ceiling raised from ₹15,000 to ₹25,000 a month · 18 September 2026 · Covers one part · use it in the example
Gives a concrete expansion of social security coverage and the large gap that remains for informal workers.
- The Cabinet raised the EPFO wage ceiling from ₹15,000 to ₹25,000 a month, bringing about 51 lakh more employees into EPF, EPS-95 and EDLI.
- The government's annual pension contribution rises by about ₹1,089 crore to around ₹11,339 crore.
- Note that over 80% of the workforce is informal and outside EPFO; the Code on Social Security, 2020, e-Shram and PM-SYM aim to reach them, but coverage remains thin.
Op-ed: Is the right to work fading under the new rural jobs law? · 1 September 2026 · Answers it directly · use it in the body
Use the shift from MGNREGA to VB-G RAM G to examine whether a rights-based guarantee survives capped allocations and cost shifting to States.
- The VB-G RAM G Act, 2025, in force from 1 July 2026, promises 125 days of work against MGNREGA's 100, but replaces demand-driven funding with normative allocations.
- Costs are shared 60:40 with most States (90:10 for north-eastern and Himalayan States), whereas the Centre paid the full MGNREGA wage bill; States may pause work for up to 60 days.
- The Samyukt Kisan Morcha, citing ministry data, says July-August person-days fell from 29.77 crore in 2025 to 20.21 crore in 2026; the Centre says the law plugs leakages.
Also related
- MGNREGA
MGNREGA is the flagship statutory right to work (rooted in Article 41); funding shortfalls and pending liabilities test exactly this question.