Pratidin
Society, justice and ethicsConstitutional amendments2019

103rd Amendment

Allowed up to 10% reservation for economically weaker sections.

Written by Pratidin; every fact checked by a separate review before publishing. How we work

Inserted Articles 15(6) and 16(6).

The old Parliament House (Sansad Bhavan), New Delhi.
The old Parliament House (Sansad Bhavan), New Delhi. Nikhilb239, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Practise this in the app: flashcards, quiz and a timed answer
Prelims

Quick recall

Which clauses did the 103rd Amendment add?
Articles 15(6) and 16(6).
How much reservation does EWS get?
Up to 10%.
Which groups are excluded from EWS?
SCs, STs and OBCs already covered by reservation.
Which case upheld EWS reservation?
Janhit Abhiyan (2022), by 3:2.
What income limit is used for EWS?
Family income below ₹8 lakh a year, with asset conditions.
Does EWS count against the 50% ceiling?
The Court held the ceiling applies to caste-based reservation, not EWS.

Asked before in UPSC

Recurring theme: Economic criteria in reservation and the reach of affirmative action

Mains
  1. 2024 · GS1 · 15 marks

    Despite comprehensive policies for equity and social justice, underprivileged sections are not yet getting the full benefits of affirmative action envisaged by the Constitution. Comment.

  2. 2021 · GS2 · 15 marks

    Analyze the distinguishing features of the notion of Equality in the Constitutions of the USA and India.

The basics

Why it matters

The 103rd Amendment (2019) introduced up to 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections not covered by existing caste-based reservation, the first quota based on economic criteria alone.

10%
EWS reservation in jobs and education
Upheld in Janhit Abhiyan (2022).

How EWS differs

It is based on income, not caste.

EWS versus caste-based reservation
EWS quota
  • Economic criteria
  • Excludes SC, ST and OBC
  • Up to 10%
vs
Caste-based reservation
  • Social and educational backwardness
  • SC, ST, OBC
  • Capped at 50% overall

You now know

  • Added Articles 15(6) and 16(6) (2019).
  • Up to 10% reservation for EWS in education and public jobs.
  • Excludes SCs, STs and OBCs.
  • Upheld 3:2 in Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022).

Go deeper

In one line: The 103rd Amendment made economic disadvantage alone a basis for reservation.

Why it matters for UPSC

It changed the logic of reservation and tested the 50% ceiling on reservation.

The core idea

Critics argue reservation is meant for social backwardness, not poverty; supporters say poor people from all communities deserve help. The Court upheld it, noting it applies to Economically Weaker Sections outside existing quotas.

Where to go next

In one line: EWS shifted reservation debates from caste alone to economic status too.

Arguments for

Help for poor people excluded from caste-based quotas.

Arguments against

Exclusion of poor SC, ST and OBC persons from EWS, and breach of the 50% ceiling on reservation.

Issues

The high income threshold for Economically Weaker Sections covers a large share of families.

Where to go next

Economically Weaker Sections

Who qualifies for the EWS quota

In one line: EWS covers people not in SC, ST or OBC reservation with family income below ₹8 lakh a year.

Asset limits

Exclusions based on agricultural land and house size.

Use

Central and many State jobs and institutions.

Where to go next

50% ceiling on reservation

The Indra Sawhney limit

In one line: Indra Sawhney (1992) capped total reservation at 50%, save in extraordinary situations.

Tests

Maratha reservation was struck down in 2021 for breaching it.

EWS

The Court held the ceiling applies to caste-based reservation, not EWS.

Where to go next

50% ceiling on reservation: every story that connects to it (2)

Prelims-style quiz

  1. EWS reservation was introduced by the:

    1. 104th Amendment
    2. 102nd Amendment
    3. 101st Amendment
    4. 103rd Amendment
    Show answer

    Answer: (d) 103rd Amendment. The 103rd Amendment, 2019.

  2. Consider the following:
    1. EWS reservation excludes SCs, STs and OBCs.
    2. It was struck down by the Supreme Court.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) 1 only. It was upheld in 2022.

  3. The EWS judgment was decided by a majority of:

    1. 3:2
    2. 5:0
    3. 4:1
    4. 7:2
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) 3:2. 3:2.

  4. The EWS income limit is:

    1. ₹8 lakh
    2. ₹2.5 lakh
    3. ₹5 lakh
    4. ₹10 lakh
    Show answer

    Answer: (a) ₹8 lakh. ₹8 lakh a year.

Syllabus

Related stories

Primary source