Pratidin
Economy25 September 2026The Hindu, Page 12

What are the alternatives to the SWIFT payment system?

When a messaging network becomes a sanctions tool, countries build their own.

Published 25 September 2026. Written by Pratidin from the reports linked at the end; every fact checked by a separate review before publishing. How we work

An explainer in The Hindu looks at the alternatives to SWIFT, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication. SWIFT is a Belgium-based cooperative founded in 1973 that connects over 11,000 financial institutions in more than 200 countries. It is a messaging network, not a bank: it carries payment instructions between banks but does not move money itself. Because access is effectively controlled under EU and US sanctions regimes, disconnection from SWIFT, as happened to Iranian and many Russian banks, can cut a country off from much of global finance.

The main alternatives differ in design. Russia's System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS), launched by its central bank in 2014 after sanctions over Crimea, is a messaging system whose use grew sharply after Russian banks were cut off in 2022. China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), launched in 2015, is primarily a clearing and settlement system for renminbi payments, which also carries messages and still works alongside SWIFT for many transactions; it processed about RMB 175 trillion in 2024. mBridge is a shared platform for cross-border payments in central bank digital currencies, and BRICS countries have discussed a BRICS Pay system linking national platforms.

None of these comes close to SWIFT's reach, because of network effects, the dollar's dominance and banks' fear of secondary sanctions. India's approach has been to settle trade in rupees through Special Rupee Vostro Accounts, allowed by the RBI in 2022, earlier arrangements such as rupee-rial trade with Iran, and linking UPI with payment systems abroad.

Practise this in the app: flashcards, quiz and a timed answer
Prelims

Prelims facts

  • SWIFT is a Belgium-based cooperative founded in 1973 that sends payment messages; it does not move money itself.
  • China launched CIPS in 2015 and Russia launched SPFS in 2014 after Western sanctions over Crimea.
  • The RBI allowed Special Rupee Vostro Accounts in 2022 to settle trade in rupees.

Quick recall

What is SWIFT?
The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, a Belgium-based cooperative founded in 1973 that sends payment messages between banks.
Does SWIFT move money?
No. It carries payment instructions; settlement happens through banks and correspondent accounts.
What is SPFS?
Russia's System for Transfer of Financial Messages, launched in 2014 after sanctions over Crimea.
What is CIPS?
China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, launched in 2015, mainly a clearing and settlement system for renminbi payments.
What is mBridge?
A shared platform for cross-border payments using central bank digital currencies.
What are Special Rupee Vostro Accounts?
Accounts the RBI allowed in 2022 so trade can be settled in rupees.
Why do SWIFT alternatives struggle to grow?
Network effects, the dollar's dominance and banks' fear of secondary sanctions.
How many institutions does SWIFT connect?
Over 11,000 in more than 200 countries.

Prelims practice question

SWIFT, the global financial messaging network, is headquartered in:

  1. Switzerland
  2. Belgium
  3. The United States
  4. The Netherlands
Show answer

Answer: (b) Belgium. SWIFT is a cooperative headquartered in La Hulpe, Belgium.

Use this in UPSC Mains: previous-year questions

Recurring theme: Global payment systems, de-dollarisation and internationalisation of the rupee

  1. 2026 · GS2 · 10 marksCovers one partUse it in the example

    "BRICS acts as a powerful counterweight in global governance, actively amplifying the voice and influence of the Global South." Explain the role of BRICS in projecting itself as an alternative to other groupings.

    How to use this

    Gives a concrete financial example of BRICS seeking alternatives to Western-run payment plumbing, and of the limits of that effort.

    • BRICS countries have discussed a BRICS Pay system linking national payment platforms, alongside Russia's SPFS (2014) and China's CIPS (2015).
    • China's CIPS processed about RMB 175 trillion in 2024, yet no alternative comes close to SWIFT's reach of over 11,000 institutions in more than 200 countries.
    • Network effects, the dollar's dominance and banks' fear of secondary sanctions limit these alternatives; argue that interoperable rupee links suit India better than a bloc-based system.
Also asked on this theme
  1. 2026 · GS3 · 10 marks

    What do you mean by Digital Rupee? In this context, explain the working and progress of India's Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).

Prelims
  1. 2015 · Prelims

    Convertibility of rupee implies: (a) Being able to convert rupee notes into gold (b) Allowing the value of rupee to be fixed by market forces (c) Freely permitting the conversion of rupee to other currencies and vice versa (d) Developing an international market for currencies in India

Mains practice question

The use of payment systems as instruments of sanctions has pushed countries to build alternatives to SWIFT. Examine the implications for India. (150 words)

Model answer

SWIFT is a Belgium-based messaging network used by over 11,000 institutions. Cutting Iranian and Russian banks off from it showed that payment plumbing can be used as a sanctions weapon.

Alternatives

  • CIPS (China, 2015) and SPFS (Russia, 2014) for domestic-currency settlement.
  • mBridge, a shared platform for central bank digital currencies.
  • India: Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (2022), UPI links with other countries, and participation in the BIS-led Project Nexus.

Implications for India

  • Opportunity: rupee settlement reduces dollar dependence and transaction costs with partners such as the UAE and Russia.
  • Risk: joining China-led systems would create a new dependence; rupee balances pile up where trade is unbalanced.
  • Strategic autonomy: India needs options that protect trade from secondary sanctions without breaking from Western finance.

India's best path is interoperable, rupee-friendly payment links, not a bloc-based alternative.

The basics

Why this matters

Almost every cross-border bank payment starts with a SWIFT message. When sanctions cut banks off from SWIFT, as happened to Iranian and many Russian banks, trade becomes very difficult. That has pushed countries to build alternatives, and it shapes how India settles trade with partners under sanctions.

11,000+
Financial institutions connected by SWIFT
In more than 200 countries and territories.

What SWIFT is and is not

SWIFT, founded in 1973 and based in Belgium, is a cooperative that sends standardised payment messages between banks. It does not hold accounts or move money; settlement happens through correspondent banks.

SWIFT
is like
The postal service of banking
It carries the letters that tell banks to move money, but not the money itself.

The alternatives

Different countries have built different tools.

SPFS versus CIPS
SPFS (Russia, 2014)
  • Messaging system
  • Built after Crimea sanctions
  • Use grew after 2022
vs
CIPS (China, 2015)
  • Clearing and settlement for renminbi
  • Also carries messages
  • Works alongside SWIFT for many payments

How a sanctions cut-off works

Disconnection works through the network effect.

Why disconnection hurts
  1. 1Sanctions imposedBanks are disconnected or blocked.
  2. 2Messages stopThey cannot easily send payment instructions.
  3. 3Correspondents withdrawOther banks fear secondary sanctions.
  4. 4Trade stallsImporters and exporters struggle to pay or get paid.

How we got here

Alternatives grew each time sanctions tightened.

Payment systems
  1. 1973SWIFT founded
  2. 2014Russia launches SPFS
  3. 2015China launches CIPS
  4. 2022Russian banks cut off; RBI allows Special Rupee Vostro Accounts

India's approach

India has avoided joining a rival bloc. It settles some trade in rupees through Special Rupee Vostro Accounts and links UPI with other countries' payment systems, as part of a wider goal of Rupee internationalisation. The fear of Secondary sanctions limits how far any alternative can go.

You now know

  • SWIFT is a Belgium-based messaging cooperative founded in 1973; it does not move money.
  • Russia built SPFS in 2014 and China built CIPS in 2015.
  • Network effects and fear of secondary sanctions keep most banks on SWIFT.
  • India uses Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (2022) and UPI links rather than a rival bloc.

Go deeper

In one line: SWIFT is the messaging backbone of global banking, and sanctions have pushed countries to build alternatives that reduce their exposure to it.

Why it matters for UPSC

It links GS2 (effect of other countries' policies on India) with GS3 (external sector, rupee internationalisation). Prelims often tests what SWIFT is and is not.

The core idea

Think of SWIFT as the postal service of banking: it carries the letters that tell banks to move money, but it does not carry the money itself. Because almost every bank uses it, being cut off is like losing your address. That is why Russia built SPFS and China built CIPS, and why central banks are experimenting with digital currency links such as mBridge.

India has taken a middle path: rupee settlement through Special Rupee Vostro Accounts and linking UPI abroad, without joining a rival bloc.

Numbers and dates to remember

  • 1973: SWIFT founded; over 11,000 institutions in 200+ countries.
  • 2014: SPFS; 2015: CIPS.
  • 2022: Special Rupee Vostro Accounts.

Where to go next

In one line: SWIFT's power comes from network effects and the dollar system, which is why alternatives have grown but not replaced it.

Messaging versus settlement

SWIFT sends instructions; money moves through correspondent accounts, often in dollars. CIPS combines clearing, settlement and messaging for renminbi payments, while Russia's SPFS mainly replaces the messaging layer.

Why alternatives stay small

  • Most banks and firms are already on SWIFT.
  • Much trade is invoiced in dollars, which ties settlement to US banks.
  • Banks fear Secondary sanctions if they deal with sanctioned parties through alternatives.

Digital currencies

mBridge, a platform for cross-border payments in central bank digital currencies, and BRICS discussions of linked national systems point to a more fragmented future.

India's options

Special Rupee Vostro Accounts let partners settle trade in rupees, but balances pile up where India imports much more than it exports. Rupee internationalisation needs deeper financial markets and a currency others want to hold.

Where to go next

CIPS

China's renminbi payment system

In one line: China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), launched in 2015, clears and settles cross-border payments in renminbi.

How it differs from SWIFT

CIPS handles settlement as well as messaging, while SWIFT only sends messages. Many CIPS payments still use SWIFT messages to reach banks outside the system.

Scale

It processed about RMB 175 trillion in 2024 and connects participants in over 100 countries.

Significance

It supports renminbi internationalisation and gives China a channel less exposed to Western sanctions, though it remains much smaller than SWIFT.

Where to go next

Special Rupee Vostro Accounts

India's rupee trade route

In one line: Special Rupee Vostro Accounts, allowed by the RBI in July 2022, let foreign banks hold rupee accounts with Indian banks to settle trade in rupees.

How they work

An Indian importer pays rupees into the foreign partner bank's vostro account; the partner can use those rupees to pay for Indian goods or invest in permitted Indian assets.

Why they matter

They reduce dependence on dollars and offer a route for trade with partners facing sanctions or dollar shortages.

Limits

If India imports far more than it exports to a partner, rupee balances accumulate with little use, which discourages partners from settling in rupees.

Where to go next

Secondary sanctions

Why banks avoid alternatives

In one line: Secondary sanctions penalise third-country firms or banks for dealing with a sanctioned country, not just the sanctioning country's own firms.

How they differ

Primary sanctions stop a country's own companies from dealing with a target. Secondary sanctions threaten outsiders, for example by cutting them off from the US financial system or imposing tariffs.

Why they are powerful

Because the dollar and US banks are central to world trade, most global banks comply rather than risk losing access.

India's experience

India has faced this pressure over Russian defence deals under CAATSA and over Russian oil purchases under the 2026 sanctions law.

Where to go next

Secondary sanctions: every story that connects to it (3)

Rupee internationalisation

The bigger goal behind it

In one line: Rupee internationalisation means increasing the use of the rupee in cross-border trade, investment and reserves.

Steps taken

Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (2022), rupee invoicing of exports, UPI links abroad and allowing more foreign investment in rupee assets.

Benefits

Lower currency risk for Indian traders, less need for dollar reserves, and more influence in regional trade.

Obstacles

Capital account restrictions, shallow bond markets, a persistent trade deficit, and the dominance of the dollar. Internationalisation usually follows economic size and financial openness rather than preceding it.

Where to go next

Syllabus

Related stories